ABSTRACT
Background: The long-term sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) significantly affects quality of life (QoL) in disease survivors. Delayed development of the adaptive immune response is associated with more severe disease and a worse prognosis in COVID-19. The effects of delayed immune response on COVID-19 sequelae and QoL are unknown. Methods: We conducted a prospective study to assess the relationship between the delayed antibody response in the acute phase of infection in naïve unvaccinated patients suffering from severe or critical COVID-19 and their QoL 12 months after hospital discharge. The 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) questionnaire was used for assessment of QoL. The SF-12 evaluates both mental and physical components of QoL, incorporating a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). A delayed antibody response was defined as testing negative for anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the time of hospital admission. Results: The study included 274 patients (154 men and 120 women). Of the enrolled patients, 144 had a delayed immune response. These patients had a significantly lower MCS-12 (p = 0.002), but PCS-12 (p = 0.397) was not significantly different at the 12-month follow-up compared to patients with positive anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The MCS-12 at the time of follow-up was negatively associated with delayed antibody response irrespective of possible confounders (p = 0.006; B = 3.609; ηp2 = 0.035; 95% CI = 1.069-6.150). An MSC-12 below 50 points at the time of follow-up was positively associated with delayed antibody response (p = 0.001; B = 1.092; OR = 2.979; 95% CI = 1.554-5.711). Conclusions: This study confirmed that, in patients with severe and critical COVID-19, a negative result for anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the time of hospital admission is associated with a lower mental component of QoL in unvaccinated patients naïve to COVID-19 one year after hospital discharge.
ABSTRACT
The association between COVID-19 severity and antibody response has not been clearly determined. We aimed to assess the effects of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 S protein at the time of hospital admission on in-hospital and longitudinal survival. Methods: A prospective observational study in naive hospitalised COVID-19 patients. The presence of anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG was evaluated using a lateral flow assay at the time of admission. The patients were followed up for 8-30 months to assess survival. We recruited 554 patients (330 men and 224 women). Overall, 63.0% of the patients had positive IgG or IgM anti-S SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the time of hospital admission. In the univariate analysis, the patients with negative anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies were referred to the hospital sooner, had lower CRP and D-dimer concentrations, and were hospitalised longer. They were also more likely to be admitted to an intensive care unit and more often received baricitinib treatment. During their hospital stay, 8.5% of the antibody-positive and 22.3% of the antibody-negative patients died (p = 0.0001). The median duration of the follow-up was 21 months. During the follow-up after hospital discharge, 3.6% of antibody-positive and 9.1% of antibody-negative patients died (p = 0.027). In the multivariate analysis, the negative anti-S SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were associated with a higher risk of in-hospital death (OR 3.800; 95% CI 1.844-7.829; p = 0.0001) and with a higher risk of death during follow-up (OR 2.863; 95% CI 1.110-7.386; p = 0.030). These associations were independent of age, the time from symptom onset to hospital admission, CRP, D-Dimer, the number of comorbidities, disease severity at the time of hospital admission, and baricitinib therapy. Our study concludes that negative anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG at the time of admission are associated with higher in-hospital mortality and cause a higher risk of all-cause death during follow-up after discharge.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oleic acid, polyphenols, and other components abundantly present in olive oil are thought to be partly responsible for the antiatherogenic effects attributed to the Mediterranean diet. One of the expected outcomes is a positive impact on the lipoprotein spectrum, but also other benefits are to be expected. MATERIAL/METHODS: The analysis was conducted on 28 outpatients older than 50 years of age (mean age 68.1, 95%CI 64.9-71.3). The supplement was taken for 6 weeks and involved daily consumption of 2 tablespoons (approx. 20 g) of extra-virgin olive oil as part of the subjects' habitual diets, without changing their usual total energy and fat c onsumption. This phase was followed by a 2-month wash-out. RESULTS: After dietary supplementation with olive oil, serum total- and LDL-cholesterol mean concentrations were lowered by 0.818 mmol/l (p<0.00002; 95% CI -1.142 to -0.493 mmol/l) and 0.782 mmol/l (p=0.00013; 95% CI -1.141 to -0.423 mmol/l), respectively. There was also a significant decline in the total-to-HDL and LDL-to-HDL cholesterol ratios (p<0.03 and p<0.015). Linolic and ar achidonic acid content in serum phospholipids decreased significantly (p<0.01 andcl p<0.001, respectively). The n-3 PUFAs were not affected. CONCLUSIONS: These results point to an overwhelmingly beneficial influence of olive oil on the lipoprotein spectrum. The statistically significant reduction in arachidonic acid may even be regarded as clinically desirable. An excellent complementarity between the effects of MUFAs and long-chain n-3 PUFAs is to be expected.
